Tree Fruit Leader, Vol. 1(1) Feb. 1992
Apple Shading to Reduce Heat Damage
H. Arndt, P.Ag. Horticultural Specialist BCMAFF, Kelowna
Apple quality in the Okanagan has suffered from heat damage (sun
scald) in certain years. Individual apples become blemished on the
exposed side due to cell breakdown from extreme heat. This injury
may occur any time during the months of July, August or September,
when air temperatures reach 28oC to 32oC or
higher. Damaged fruit is downgraded or culled, depending on the
severity of the damage, resulting in major economic losses to the
producer.
Most apple varieties are subject to some degree of sunburn during
hot summer years. Jonagold, however, appears to be more sensitive to
this condition than other varieties. This is especially so on
younger trees. The damage usually occurs to exposed apples hanging
on the outside of the canopy and on the southwest side of the fruit.
It is usually the early to mid-afternoon sun that causes this type
of damage. On Jonagold, losses in the Kelowna area have been as high
as 50 percent of the total crop.
Various methods have been tried to reduce or prevent sunburn to
apples but with limited success.
In 1991 a trial was carried out in the Kelowna area using 30
percent shade cloth. This was hung over a six-foot-high,
four-year-old slender spindle planting on a post and wire structure.
The variety was Jonagold. Tree rows were planted north and south.
Results showed that this technique reduced total sunburn by up to
15 percent over the non-covered treatment.
| |
SUNBURN AT HARVEST
(% of Apples Harvested) |
| |
No Damage |
Slight Damage(1) |
Moderate Damage(2) |
Severe Damage(3) |
| No Cover |
72.2% |
20.75% |
7.05% |
0 |
| 30% Shade Cloth |
87.4% |
10.27% |
2.33% |
0 |
(1) Slight Damage - Noticeable
discoloration on close inspection.
(2) Moderate Damage - Distinct yellow discoloration of fruit.
(3) Severe Damage - Noticeable browning of skin. |
Sunburn occurred under the shaded area to fruit on the lower
limbs which were exposed to direct sun. This probably occurred
during the late afternoon where the shade cloth did not protect the
fruit from the angle of the sun. Structural changes will be made to
address this problem for the 1992 trial. Slight damage showed on
some fruit on the top of the trees under the shaded area.
Damage occurred in the week of September 22 to 28 when
temperatures shot up to 27 and 29oC. No fruit burn had
been observed earlier. In 1991 sunburn occurred more on the
southeast to south side of the fruit as opposed to the southwest
side in other years.
No noticeable differences in fruit colour were observed under the
shaded plots. A side benefit of the shade cloth is that it can serve
as a hail net. This became apparent on July 31 when a freak hail
storm occurred. No hail damage was found under the shade cloth.
The cost of erecting the shade cloth for this experiment was
approximately 22 cents per square foot. This included the shade
cloth and structural materials. At this price, if one were to cover
2/3 of an acre (actual canopy of planted area) it would cost $6,325.
The shade cloth is required to be in place for only three months of
the year and thus could be reused for quite a number of years. It
should not be left up over the winter, as it would suffer snow
damage and weathering.
At this time the cost per acre seems too high to be economical
for most growers. Until a cheaper source of shade cloth is found and
a better structure is built to reduce sunburn damage greater than 15
percent, growers should view this practise with caution.
|