 |
|
|
Tree Fruit & Grape News, March 1999
Mating Disruption of Codling Moth
Gary J.R. Judd
Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre,
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Summerland
In 1992, I wrote an article for the British Columbia Orchardist
(Vol. 15(3):13-15) entitled, "Management of Codling Moth with
Pheromone: a new twist in insect control", in which I discussed how
effective this new technology was, and how a small group of organic
apple growers in Cawston were leading a successful charge into a new
era of insect control.
Unfortunately, that was the same year the Okanagan-Kootenay
Sterile Insect Release Program, better known as SIR, received
funding to build the rearing facility in Osoyoos. As a result of the
SIR initiative, interest in the control of codling moth with
pheromones was low, but I continued to speak to various growers’
groups explaining to each that this was "what everybody else would
be doing". By everybody else, I meant our American cousins. History
has proved me correct as in Washington State (WA) alone, 57 thousand
acres of apples were treated with pheromones to control codling moth
in 1998.
What are pheromones?
Pheromones are natural chemicals, usually produced by the female
of a species to communicate and signal her presence to potential
mates. Based on this normal biological function, pheromones are
quite simply defined as, chemical sex attractants. The
existence of pheromones has been known to entomologists for over 30
years, and codlemone, the major active ingredient in the
codling moth sex pheromone, has been known for 25 years. Scientists
have developed methods of synthesizing pheromones in the laboratory,
and many are readily available for commercial use. For over a
decade, many growers have been using synthetic codlemone in traps to
monitor male codling moth populations and time insecticide sprays.
How can pheromones be used to control insects?
When sufficient synthetic pheromone is released into the air
within an orchard, male codling moths become confused, and are
unable to find females. When normal chemical communication between
male and female moths is disrupted, mating is disrupted, fewer
fertile eggs are laid, fewer larvae hatch and less damage occurs.
This entire process is commonly called "pheromone confusion"
or "mating disruption" (MD).
There are several ways excessive pheromone confuses male codling
moths. Firstly, male moths follow the false pheromone trails created
by the release of synthetic pheromone into the wind, thereby making
themselves unavailable for mating. Secondly, male moths exposed to
high concentrations of pheromone become so desensitised to pheromone
that they no longer smell it, or respond. Normally, an insect’s
nose, that is it’s antennae, detects the pheromone and sends a
message to the brain. However, after long exposure to pheromone,
neither the antennae nor the brain respond; this is known as
habituation. Thirdly, the highly concentrated synthetic pheromone
trails released from dispensers, mask or camouflage, the weaker,
natural pheromone trails of female codling moths.
Applying pheromones
Various systems for applying and releasing synthetic pheromone
into an orchard have been devised. One of the simplest, and the one
that is registered in Canada and currently being used throughout
Washington, is a reddish brown plastic dispenser that looks
something like a garbage bag "twist tie" (Fig. 1). This dispenser
also known as a Shin-etsu Rope, is sold under the trade name
ISOMATE-C+ (South Valley Sales and Growers Supply). The
Isomate-C+ dispenser is a hollow, sealed tube that contains about
200 milligrams of liquid pheromone. Upon exposure to warm air or
sunlight the dispenser heats up and pheromone is released as a gas
through the plastic wall of the tube. When numerous dispensers are
releasing pheromone into the air of an orchard they create a cloud
of pheromone. In order for MD to be effective, the pheromone cloud
must be maintained above a critical concentration during variable
weather conditions for several months. Years of research have been
spent developing release devices to achieve this objective.
Pheromone must be applied before codling moth begin to fly
and mate in the spring. This means that the pheromone dispensers are
usually applied in late April or early May, depending on the
temperatures in your area. Pheromone dispensers must be fastened
to lateral branches near the top of the tree, usually in the top
third, on strong branches that will not hang low when fruit are
present. In old standard plantings this can require a ladder to hang
dispensers, although some inventive American grower has built a
special tool on a pole to attach them without a ladder (pheromone
retailers should be able to provide these).
Research has shown that one spring application of 400 dispensers
per acre is sufficient to provide season-long control of codling
moth in B.C. We know from many experiments over the last 10 years
that applying more than 400 dispensers per acre does not improve
control, it is just a waste of pheromone and money to treat at
levels above 400 per acre. The 400 dispensers are distributed evenly
throughout the orchard. For example, if an orchard has 400 trees per
acre then every tree should have one dispenser. In addition, the
density of pheromone dispensers should be applied at a double rate
(equivalent of 800 per acre) along the border trees. Therefore, each
edge tree in our example should receive two dispensers. Research has
shown that codling moth can be controlled with 200 dispensers per
acre, provided population densities are low, applying one cover
spray of Guthion during the first flight of wild moths ensures
populations are low. Pheromone should always be applied first and
then the spray, do not wait until you spray to apply pheromone.
How well does pheromone confusion work?
In 1990 we began using MD on a small scale with five organic
growers in Cawston. They have continued to use MD to this day, most
recently in combination with SIR, but earlier in combination with
tree-banding to catch overwintering larvae because they could not
use Guthion to reduce starting populations. Research has shown that
as much as 50-60% of the overwintering codling moth population can
be removed and destroyed using banding techniques. Table 1
summarises the levels of damage seen in these pheromone-treated
orchards over the last 10 years. Some comparison orchards receiving
Guthion sprays (1990-1992) or in recent years Guthion sprays and SIR
(1995-1998) are also shown. It is very clear that the combination of
MD and SIR is a very powerful control strategy. Our experiences here
have been mirrored by a similar, but larger trial (600 acres), in
Oroville, WA. Table 2 shows results provided by the USDA, at Wapato,
showing a significant reduction in damage and populations of wild
codling moth by using a combination of MD + Guthion in the early
years and MD + SIR more recently.
| Table 1. Percent codling moth
damage at harvest in organic orchards receiving mating
disruption (MD) alone (1990-92), MD + SIR (1995-98) or
conventional orchards receiving Guthion alone (1990-92) or
Guthion + SIR (1995-98). |
| Orchard Type and Number* |
Orchard Treatment |
Codling Moth Harvest Damage |
| |
|
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
| O-1 |
MD |
0.55 |
0.12 |
0.11 |
0.9 |
0.06 |
0 |
0 |
| O-2 |
MD |
0.21 |
2.40 |
1.52 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| O-3 |
MD |
0.78 |
0.17 |
0.08 |
0.02 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| O-4 |
MD |
0.75 |
0.47 |
0.97 |
0.5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| O-5 |
MD |
- |
- |
- |
0.2 |
0.03 |
0 |
0 |
| C-1 |
Guthion x2 |
0.30 |
- |
- |
0.2 |
0.02 |
0 |
0 |
| C-2 |
Guthion x3 |
1.85 |
0.14 |
- |
0.2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| C-3 |
Guthion x3 |
- |
0.04 |
- |
1.1 |
0.04 |
0 |
0 |
| C-4 |
Guthion x2 |
- |
0.02 |
- |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| *Organic (O) or Conventional
(C) |
Limitations of pheromone confusion
Our research has shown that when disruption fails to control
codling moth damage below an economic threshold (1.0%), this lack of
control was correlated with one of several factors:
1) Experience has shown that MD like SIR, works best when initial
codling moth population densities are low. As a general rule, MD as
a stand-alone tool is not recommended when codling moth damage was
greater than 2% in the previous year. However, we have shown that
higher populations are not a problem if good orchard sanitation
precedes pheromone treatment, or if growers apply one cover spray of
Guthion at the correct time during the first flight of the season.
2) MD has not worked as well in orchards with trees taller than
12-15 feet, unless you also apply a cover spray. We know this is
related to the larger canopy volumes in larger trees, which simply
means more pheromone is required in taller trees, or a lower
population to start with. It is more effective to apply a cover
spray than it is to put out more pheromone.
3) Orchards or blocks to be treated with pheromone should be
larger than one acre to lower the chances that mated females will
fly in from neighbouring trees. Remember, MD of moths in your
orchard, will not control mating of moths in your neighbours
orchard! The best thing to do is to have several growers in an area
treat with pheromone, this area-wide approach is being used
successfully in Washington State. In areas being treated by SIR
there is no need to worry about immigration of moths into a small
orchard because chances are that moths entering your orchard will be
sterile.
4) MD will not work in a backyard setting with very few
trees because the pheromone cloud I referred to earlier is created
by having a dense uniform tree canopy. Therefore, orchards with many
missing trees or open spaces and variable canopy heights are not
good sites for MD.
Summary. The major limiting factor to successful use of MD
is population density. If initial populations are low enough, most
of the problems listed above become unimportant, so everybody should
apply that first cover spray the first year they use MD. In the
second year of use the spray will probably not be needed.
| Table 2. Reductions in catches of
wild codling moths (CM) and damage in Oroville, WA, orchards
receiving a combination of MD + SIR from 1995-98*. |
| Year |
Average wild CM
catches/trap/season |
Sterile:wild ratio |
Percent damage |
| 1995 |
4.29 |
31 to 1 |
0.22 |
| 1996 |
0.82 |
181 to 1 |
0.04 |
| 1997 |
0.31 |
369 to 1 |
0.06 |
| 1998 |
0.16 |
686 to 1 |
0.07 |
| *Data supplied by the USDA,
ARS Laboratory, Wapato, WA. |
Who is or should use MD for control of codling moth?
MD will continue to be used by organic growers throughout BC and
the rest of the world, but more locally, conventional growers who
have not seen their codling moth counts come down under the SIR
program should most definitely use this new tool. Growers in Zones 2
and 3 of the SIR program should look to use MD disruption in
combination with their current Guthion controls, just to ensure they
have low populations of codling moth when SIR comes to their area.
Availability of codling moth ISOMATE-C+ in Canada
Isomate-C+ is the only registered pheromone product available for
control of codling moth in Canada, it can be purchased through
regular chemical retailers or through contact with the SIR program
staff in Osoyoos. Applicators for applying Isomate-C+ should also be
available through these same outlets. More information on using
Isomate-C+ should be available from the SIR Program staff.
Future research on MD
The success of mating disruption research in WA and elsewhere,
indicates that pheromone confusion, as a method of controlling
insects, is here to stay. An application rate of 200 Isomate-C+
dispensers per acre at a cost of about $75 CDN for the product and
one hour of labour to apply, makes MD cost competitive with
conventional insecticides. Research in 1999 will examine for the
third year the effectiveness of a MD product, ISOMATE-CM/LR that
will control codling moth and leafrollers at the same time. This
product will bring down the cost of insect control substantially. In
addition to our work on codling moth, we are currently conducting
mating disruption research on eye-spotted bud moth and mullein bug
among others. We hope our ongoing research will make the production
of insecticide-free fruit a reality for many local growers in the
not too distant future.
|