 |
|
|
Tree Fruit & Grape News, July 1999
Comparing Fertigation and Broadcast-Application of N, P and K
Fertilizers in Orchards - Part 1
G.H. Neilsen and D. Neilsen
Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food
Canada, Summerland, B.C., Canada V0H 1Z0
This article was too long to include it entirely so we have
divided it into Part 1 Nitrogen and Part 2 Phosphorus, Potassium and
other. Part 2 will be published in the next
issue.
Summary
Broadcast or foliar fertilizer applications have been
traditionally used to improve or sustain the nutrition of many
irrigated, deciduous fruit tree orchards in western North America.
Recent developments, including adoption of low-pressure,
micro-irrigation systems and planting at higher densities
(especially for apple), have increased interest in controlled
application of fertilizers directly with irrigation (fertigation).
This article summarizes recent research, emphasizing results from
high-density apple orchards and comparing fertigation to traditional
broadcast fertilize application with respect to mobility of N, P and
K in the soil and response of fruit trees to application of these
nutrients. It is adapted from a more detailed article to appear in
Hort Technology in June 1999.
Virtually all fruit crops in Western North America are irrigated,
and irrigation systems range from gravity flow (flood irrigation) to
a variety of sprinkler, low-pressure-microsprinkler or
drip-distribution systems. Low-volume irrigation systems are well
suited to the high-density apple orchards that are increasingly
important in British Columbia. For example, "new" apple
cultivars, like Gala and Fuji are propagated on dwarfing rootstocks
such as M.9 and M.26 and planted at tree densities which vary from
approximately 240 trees/acre (600/ha) (some "traditional"
central-leader plantings) to nearly 800 trees/acre (2,000/ha)
(slender-spindle plantings) and even in excess of 2,400 trees/acre
(6,000/ha) ("super spindle" plantings). At present, low
volume irrigation systems are being installed in nearly all of the
new, high- and very high-density orchards in British Columbia.
Application of nutrients with irrigation (fertigation) is the most
efficient method of nutrient delivery in this type of irrigation
system. Fertigation offers increased flexibility in managing orchard
nutrition programs because of the potential for more closely
synchronizing nutrient application with plant demand. There is a
need, however, to assess the effectiveness of any new fertilization
strategy relative to traditional methods. In the irrigated fruit
growing regions of western North America, the traditional method of
meeting fruit crop nutrient requirements has involved a combination
of soil and foliar applications. However, this review will focus on
the major nutrients N, P and K, which, when required, have
traditionally been applied via broadcast or banded application to
the soil. The emphasis will be on comparing and contrasting
fertigation and broadcast fertilizer application, as they affect the
mobility of NPK in orchard soils and response of fruit trees to
their application. This article focuses on high density apple
orchards on dwarfing rootstocks with low volume irrigation systems.
Nitrogen Broadcast Application
Soil Mobility. Remarkably few measurements of change in
soil N status have been made following broadcast application of
N-fertilizer in irrigated fruit orchards. The mobility of
fertilizer-N in response to irrigation has long been recognized for
irrigated crops in both humid and arid regions, especially for those
on sandy soil. Mobility of applied N fertilizer was observed in an
orchard lysimeter study of nine years duration at the Summerland
Research Station in which the amount of irrigation water applied via
sprinkler varied from 37 to 100 per cent of the maximum for the
area. The experimental soil was a sandy loam, containing 64 per cent
sand in the surface horizon and grading to 90 per cent sand at
depth. The amount of N drained from the 5 ft (1.5 m) deep base of
the lysimeter and thus through the rootzone of 'Macspur McIntosh'
apple on 'Malling- Merton 111' (MM.111) rootstock was generally high
relative to the amount of applied fertilizer, especially in the
first year of an increased irrigation rate.
Table 1. Average quantity of N leached below 5 ft (1.5
m) depth in an orchard lysimeter at Summerland Research Station
planted to 'Macspur McIntosh' on 'Malling-Merton 111' rootstock with
variable irrigation and 145 lb N/acre (162 kg/ha) applied annually.z
| Year |
Irrigation
(% of maximum) |
Annual irrigation + precipitation
[inches/yr (mm/yr)] |
Leached N/yr
[lb N/acre (kg N/ha)] |
| 1 |
37 |
30 (763) |
162 (181) |
| 2 |
37 |
29 (728) |
92 (103) |
| 3 |
37 |
30 (760) |
69 (77) |
| 4 |
50 |
43 (1101) |
200 (224) |
| 5 |
50 |
36.5 (928) |
38 (43) |
| 6 |
60 |
45 (1141) |
37.5 (42) |
| 7 |
75 |
57 (1459) |
96 (107) |
| 8 |
100 |
69 (1750) |
242 (271) |
| 9 |
50 |
43 (1086) |
89 (100) |
zData adapted from Stevenson and Neilsen (1990)
Plant Response. In the irrigated fruit growing areas of
the Pacific Northwest, practical experience and local research,
primarily in high- pressure, sprinkler-irrigated orchards, has
resulted in recommendations to apply N at rates ranging from 67-134
lb N/acre (75-150 kg/ha), usually as ammonium nitrate (34N-0P-0K)
and more infrequently as urea (46N-0P-0K) or calcium nitrate
(15.5N-0P-0K), often as a single application in fall or early
spring. Excess N applications can have adverse effects on fruit
quality by reducing red colour development while internal ethylene
production, indicative of accelerating maturity, continue to
increase. Actual grower application rates can exceed recommended
values and usually exceed crop N removal rates, which have been
estimated to be 20-30 lb N/acre (22-33 kg/ha) for a 40-60 ton/acre
(45-67 t/ha) crop of Golden Delicious. Furthermore, N applications
are usually made within herbicide strips to avoid N-uptake by
strongly competitive orchard floor vegetation.
Figure 1a

Figure 1b

Figure 1c

Figure 1d

Fertigation
Soil Mobility. The mobility of NO3-N (the end
product of all fertilizer N applications to soil), particularly when
applied by fertigation, is well known. Porous ceramic cup soil
solution samplers have been utilized to monitor changes in macro
nutrient status (especially N) of the soil in response to
fertigation regime. Collecting samples from fixed locations relative
to irrigation emitters and at fixed times relative to the cessation
of irrigation has indicated that the NO3-N concentration
in soil solution is very responsive to N-fertigation. For example,
in fertigation management studies in British Columbia, soil solution
NO3-Nconcentrations increased to high values at 1 ft (30
cm) depth soon after the commencement of fertigation with calcium
nitrate and declined to background values soon after cessation of
fertigation (Fig. 1a-d). This pattern was similar for both a silt
loam (Fig. 1a) and a loamy sand soil (Fig. 1b) with solution
concentrations approximating the concentration of the fertigation
solution and thus directly correlated with the rate of applied
fertilizer. Soil solution concentrations were also directly
influenced by the volume of applied irrigation water so that
doubling irrigation rates from 1-2 gal/tree (4-8 L) per day almost
halved soil solution NO3-N concentrations for both silt
loam (Fig. 1c) and loamy sand (Fig. 1d) soils. The form of N
fertilizer applied also influences soil solution NO3-N
concentration. When applied as NH4-N there is a delay in the
increase of NO3-N at the start and a slowing of the
decrease at the cessation of fertigation (Fig. 2). Consistent with
the work of Klein and Spieler (1987b), only low concentrations of NH4-N
were measurable despite fertigating all N as NH4-N.
Control of soil solution NO3-N over time is clearly more
precise if NO3-N forms are used and the manipulation of N
to achieve high or low soil NO3-N concentrations at different times
during the growing season is a practical possibility. A comparison
of the seasonal variation of soil solution NO3-N
concentration when the same amount of N fertilizer [0.9 oz N/tree
(25 g)] was applied, either as a single broadcast application
(standard practice under sprinkler irrigation), or as multiple drip-fertigated
doses, indicated a higher average soil solution NO3-N
concentration during the growing season for the fertigated treatment
(Fig. 3).
Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Plant Response. Generally, research has indicated that
fertigation permits the amount of N applied to be reduced relative
to broadcast rates while maintaining a similar N status of fruit
trees. In Michigan, similar yield and leaf N concentration of
several fruit tree species was measured when the amount of
trickle-applied N was reduced to 50 per cent of the normal
recommended broadcast rates. Efficient use of fertigated N was also
measured in England where the best balance between shoot growth,
fruit bud production, fruit set and cumulative yield of 'Queen
Cox'/M.9 apple in the first four growing seasons was achieved at
only 0.7 oz (20 g) fertigated N split into 80 daily doses per tree
[23 lb N/acre (26 kg/ha]). Fertigation rates can be much closer to
the estimated N removal rates for the crop.
The consequences of excessive application of N are similar,
whether fertigated or broadcast. Decreased fruit color and delayed
harvest for Starking Delicious apple were observed when fertigated N
applications exceeded 223 lb/acre (250 kg/ha) in Israel. Both NH4-N
and NO3-N forms have been effectively used to fertigate
fruit trees. Urea, ammonium nitrate and calcium nitrate have been
found to be acceptable N sources for fertigation with use of calcium
nitrate being advantageous when soil pH is low and Mn toxicity a
potential problem.
As indicated above, it is possible to monitor variation in soil
solution N-concentrations using suction lysimeters. Less information
is available concerning an optimum soil solution N concentration for
apple tree growth. For example, there were few effects of either
irrigation or fertigation treatments on leaf N, tree growth and
yield despite differences in soil solution NO3-N
concentrations observed in Fig. 1, implying the lowest soil solution
N concentrations (50-75 ppm) were adequate for growth of young apple
trees. Midsummer leaf N concentration of trees receiving NH4-N
rather than NO3-N was significantly lower (2.27 vs.
2.33%) only in the year following initiation of differential N-forms
when fertigating despite differences in soil solution NO3-N
concentrations during the growing season (Fig. 2). The different
soil solution N-regimes illustrated in Fig. 3 resulted in leaf N
concentration averaging 2.54 per cent over five years for fertigated
trees and 2.40 per cent for trees receiving broadcast N fertilizer.
Few measurable differences in growth and yield were observed,
however, between the two treatments. In Israel, a 42 ppm NO3-N
concentration (Hoaglund solution) resulted in most efficient use of
N by daily fertigated Golden Delicious apple grown in outdoor pots,
even though plant N-uptake continued to increase to 154 ppm. With
the capability of monitoring variation in soil solution
N-concentrations using suction lysimeters, additional research is
required to determine a minimum soil solution N concentration and
duration capable of supporting adequate tree growth, and to
determine the consequence to fruit production of maintaining optimum
N-concentrations at different times during the growing season.
|