Tree Fruit Leader, Vol. 5(2) Nov. 1996
How Effective is Your Early Season Weed Control?
by Eugene Hogue, Pomologist, Agriculture & Agri-Food
Canada, Summerland Research Centre
and Mike Sanders, Tree Fruit Specialist, Kelowna
Replanting on old, tired soils is a very difficult task leaving
very little margin of error. Very often weeds are one of the main
contributors to poor tree growth.
In the last edition of the "Tree Fruit Leader" some
research from New York and Summerland was referred to. This
suggested that for optimum tree growth, weed control must start
early in the season and that even a few weeds interfere with tree
growth.
To test these contentions some weed control demonstration plots
were organized. The work was done by Michael Andres, a summer
student funded by the OVTFA.
Twelve growers in the Kelowna area agreed to cooperate in this
project. At each site, ten trees were selected for weekly spraying
beginning around May 1, and 10 trees were selected for weekly
spraying beginning around June 1. These trees and 10 trees that
received the growers herbicide program had trunk calipers measured
at the start of the season and again on August 16. Increase in trunk
caliper is considered an accurate measure of tree growth.
Four of the plantings that had predominantly whips planted had
total terminal growth measured in August. The results indicate that
there were no statistically significant differences in growth
response due to weekly weed control from either early June or early
May (Table 1). However, the data shows a clear trend of increasing
vigour with trees weeded weekly from June lover grower treatments,
usually 4 weeks or more between treatments, and of trees weeded
weekly from May 1 over those weeded weekly from June 1.
The lack of statistical difference may have been due to several
factors. First, the overall vigour in fields chosen was not
generally high. The biggest differences due to weed control
practices would be expected when other factors were not limiting.
Secondly, in the design of the experiment, the number of trees used
was too low to allow us to show the relatively small differences
occurring over the abbreviated testing period. Natural variability
will mask differences. Thirdly, the weed control programs in the
grower plantings chosen were generally quite good, and although our
weekly treatments had a clearly visible effect on the appearance of
the orchard floor, most of the growers did not allow excessive
competition to occur.
We are satisfied that these demonstration trials have shown that
maintaining the area around newly planted apple trees on dwarfing
rootstocks free of competition is clearly beneficial. The trials
also demonstrated that keeping weeds out of a new planting in the
early season is difficult when irregularly using only non-residual
chemicals like glyphosate or paraquat. To obtain weed free
conditions from planting through to mid to late summer, the critical
growth period, therefore, it is worth considering the use of
residual herbicides.
TABLE I: The effect of Maintaining Area around Newly Planted
Apple Trees on Early Growth.
| |
Growth |
| Treatment |
Stem Diam. (mm) at 20 cm height |
Increase in stem diam. (%) |
Terminal growth (cm) |
| Grower Weed control regime |
16.9 |
12.4 |
160 |
| Weekly spraying from June 1 |
18.9 |
13.7 |
170 |
| Weekly spraying from May I |
20.5 |
14.6 |
183 |
| Significance (5%) |
NSo |
NS |
NS |
Only 4 sites where whips were planted were used for these omeasurements.
o NS - not significant at 5% using ANOVA.
|